IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v19y2001i4p533-544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Development and the ‘New Architecture of Aid’: Convergence and Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • John Farrington
  • James Lomax

Abstract

In this article donor practice is examined in relation to a number of major issues — current and emerging — in rural development. The article focuses first on areas in which there appears to be growing convergence and then on those characterised by differences of approach. Practical problems likely to limit the effectiveness of donor strategy include those of managing sector‐wide approaches and of linking rural and urban policy. Constraints on the implementation of pro‐poor initiatives are pervasive, but have received little attention in poverty‐focused initiatives such as Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. Finally, chronic political instability continues to limit development support (as distinct from relief) in many of the areas in which concentrations of the poor are greatest.

Suggested Citation

  • John Farrington & James Lomax, 2001. "Rural Development and the ‘New Architecture of Aid’: Convergence and Constraints," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 533-544, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:533-544
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-7679.00150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-7679.00150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burris, Mark W. & Pendyala, Ram M., 2002. "Discrete choice models of traveler participation in differential time of day pricing programs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 241-251, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:533-544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.