IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v19y2001i4p507-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livelihood Insecurity and Social Protection: A Re‐emerging Issue in Rural Development

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Devereux

Abstract

Risk and vulnerability have been rediscovered as key features of rural livelihoods and poverty, and are currently a focus of policy attention. The poor themselves try to manage uncertainty using a variety of ex‐ante and ex‐post risk management strategies, and through community support systems, but these are both fragile and economically damaging. State interventions working through food, labour or credit markets have proved expensive and unsustainable in the past, though encouraging and innovative institutional partnerships are emerging. This article argues that the way forward lies in new approaches to social protection which underpin production as well as consumption: new thinking recognises the food security and livelihood‐protecting functions of public interventions (such as fertiliser and seed subsidies) which were previously dismissed as ‘market‐distorting’.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Devereux, 2001. "Livelihood Insecurity and Social Protection: A Re‐emerging Issue in Rural Development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 507-519, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:507-519
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-7679.00148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-7679.00148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuan-Hui Lin & Chang-Yi Chang, 2013. "Everyday crises," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Nicholas Awortwi, 2018. "Social protection is a grassroots reality: Making the case for policy reflections on community‐based social protection actors and services in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 897-913, September.
    3. Justin Quinton & Glenn P. Jenkins & Godwin Olasehinde-Williams, 2024. "How Do Household Coping Strategies Evolve with Increased Food Insecurity? An Examination of Nigeria's Food Price Shock of 2015-2018," Development Discussion Papers 2024-04, JDI Executive Programs.
    4. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Anu Susan Sam & Azhar Abbas & Subash Surendran Padmaja & Harald Kaechele & Ranjit Kumar & Klaus Müller, 2019. "Linking Food Security with Household’s Adaptive Capacity and Drought Risk: Implications for Sustainable Rural Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 363-385, February.
    6. Dufhues, Thomas & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Fischer, Isabel, 2006. "Social Capital And Rural Development: Literature Review And Current State Of The Art," IAMO Discussion Papers 92017, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    7. repec:zbw:iamodp:92017 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hadia Majid, 2022. "Drought, Farm Output and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 32-56, April.
    9. Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Siwar, Chamhuri & , Abu N.M. Wahid, 2019. "Resilience, Adaptation and Expected Support for Food Security among the Malaysian East Coast Poor Households," SocArXiv hkbwn, Center for Open Science.
    10. K.S. Kavi Kumar & Richard J.T. Klein & Cezar Ionescu & Jochen Hinkel & Rupert Klein, 2007. "Vulnerability to Poverty and Vulnerability to Climate Change : Conceptual Framework, Measurement and Synergies in Policy," Development Economics Working Papers 22502, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Ermias Debie & Amare Wubishet Ayele, 2023. "Perceived Determinants of Smallholder Households’ Resilience to Livelihood Insecurity in Goncha District, Northwest Highlands of Ethiopia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    12. Arpita Mathur, 2011. "Women and Food Security," South Asian Survey, , vol. 18(2), pages 181-206, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:507-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.