IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v27y1996i2p331-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Debate on Economic and Social Security in the Late Eighteenth Century: Lessons ofa Road Not Taken

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Rothschild

Abstract

The laissez faire political economy of the late eighteenth century was marked by two sharply opposing views of the relation between social security or insecurity and economic growth: one associated with Adam Smith, Turgot and Condorcet; and another associated with Malthus. The latter school, with its faith in the motivating force of insecurity and fear, has been the more influential in subsequent economic thought. But, contrary to prevailing neoliberal stereotypes, Smith, Turgot and Condorcet had much to say to modern students of economics concerning the necessary and positive relationship between social security and economic development. This essay explores their vision of how to improve the life chances of the disadvantaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Rothschild, 1996. "The Debate on Economic and Social Security in the Late Eighteenth Century: Lessons ofa Road Not Taken," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 27(2), pages 331-351, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:27:y:1996:i:2:p:331-351
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00593.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00593.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00593.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothschild, Emma, 1992. "Commerce and the State: Turgot, Condorcet and Smith," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(414), pages 1197-1210, September.
    2. Emma Rothschild, 1992. "Adam Smith and conservative economics," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 45(1), pages 74-96, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mueller, Paul D., 2021. "Adam Smith on moral judgment: Why people tend to make better judgments within liberal institutions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 813-825.
    2. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Economics and the Modern Minimum Wage Debate:The Large Distance Separating Kirkcaldy from Chicago," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-52, March.
    3. Lebano, A., 2010. "The concept of corporate social responsibility," ISS Working Papers - General Series 21243, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    4. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    5. Mollie Painter-Morland & Rosa Slegers, 2018. "Strengthening “Giving Voice to Values” in Business Schools by Reconsidering the “Invisible Hand” Metaphor," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 807-819, February.
    6. Erik W. Matson, 2022. "What is liberal about Adam Smith's “liberal plan”?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 593-610, October.
    7. Silvestri, Paolo, 2012. "Il 'Good Government' in Adam Smith: tra Jurisprudence, Political Œconomy e Theory of Moral Sentiments [The 'Good Government' in Adam Smith: between Jurisprudence, Political Œconomy and Theory of Mo," MPRA Paper 59546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    8. Christopher Martin, 2011. "Adam Smith and Liberal Economics: Reading the Minimum Wage Debate of 1795-96," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 8(2), pages 110-125, May.
    9. Callum Williams, 2015. "Famine: Adam Smith and Foucauldian Political Economy," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 62(2), pages 171-190, May.
    10. Martin, Christopher, 2021. "Adam Smith and the poor: A textual analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 837-849.
    11. Drylie, Scott, 2021. "Adam Smith on schooling: A classical liberal rereading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 748-770.
    12. Vu Dang Le Nguyen & Nancy K. Napier & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2012. "It Takes Two to Tango: Entrepreneurship and Creativity in Troubled Times – Vietnam 2012," Working Papers CEB 12-022, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Stuart Corbridge, 2002. "Development as freedom: the spaces of Amartya Sen," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 2(3), pages 183-217, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:27:y:1996:i:2:p:331-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.