IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v5y1997i1p3-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Defects of Stakeholder Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Sternberg

Abstract

Stakeholder theory has been widely offered as a corrective to perceived defects of business and business ethics, and as an alternative model of corporate governance. Indeed, it is now advocated so commonly as to have become a new orthodoxy. Far from being a source of improvements, however, stakeholder theory is fundamentally misguided, incapable of providing better corporate governance, business performance or business conduct. Stakeholder theory is indeed intrinsically incompatible with all substantive objectives, and undermines both private property and accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Sternberg, 1997. "The Defects of Stakeholder Theory," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 3-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:5:y:1997:i:1:p:3-10
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:5:y:1997:i:1:p:3-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.