IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v14y2006i1p43-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Funding, Governance and Passthrough Efficiency in Large UK Charities

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory O. Jobome

Abstract

This paper provides empirical evidence on how external governance mechanisms (e.g. the reporting and monitoring mandated under government funding contracts) and internal governance mechanisms (e.g. the adoption of corporate governance codes and traditional charity governance mechanisms) are related to the efficiency with which large UK charities meet their charitable spending objects. The evidence indicates that government funding and governance requirements, and traditional charity structures, are positively related to efficiency, whereas the adoption of business‐type corporate governance codes is not.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory O. Jobome, 2006. "Public Funding, Governance and Passthrough Efficiency in Large UK Charities," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 43-59, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:14:y:2006:i:1:p:43-59
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00483.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00483.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00483.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihir A. Desai & Robert J. Yetman, 2005. "Constraining Managers without Owners: Governance of the Not-for-Profit Enterprise," NBER Working Papers 11140, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia Tao & Stavros Sindakis & Charles Chen & Panagiotis Theodorou & Saloome Showkat, 2024. "Validation Analysis of Charitable Organizations and Media Monitoring Using an Evolutionary Model in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5539-5570, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Core, John E. & Guay, Wayne R. & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2006. "Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 307-333, September.
    2. Dietz Nathan & Barber Putnam & Lott Cindy & Shelly Mary, 2017. "Exploring the Relationship between State Charitable Solicitation Regulations and Fundraising Performance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 183-204, September.
    3. Spiros Bougheas & Alessia Isopi & Trudy Owens, 2012. "How do Donors Allocate Funds to NGOs? Evidence from Uganda," Discussion Papers 12/08, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    4. Carolyn J. Cordery & Dalice Sim & Tony Zijl & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Differentiated regulation: the case of charities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 131-164, March.
    5. Hofmann, Mary Ann & McSwain, Dwayne, 2013. "Financial disclosure management in the nonprofit sector: A framework for past and future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 61-87.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:14:y:2006:i:1:p:43-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.