IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/chinae/v33y2025i2p65-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Quality and Safety Demonstration Zone Policy Lower Nontariff Barriers? Evidence from Sino–US Food and Agricultural Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Xiao
  • Genyuan Zhong
  • Xifang Ma

Abstract

Technical regulations and product standards are increasingly hindering international food and agricultural trade, particularly for developing countries. This paper examines the impact of China's place‐based agricultural policy – specifically, the establishment of quality and safety demonstration zones for exported food and agricultural products – on reducing the disparity in product standards between China and the US. Using panel data for Chinese cities between 2009 and 2017, this study employed a difference‐indifferences approach and found that the policy significantly reduced the incidences of US import refusals related to China's exported products. Mechanism analysis suggests that adoption of new production technology was the primary driver of this improvement, narrowing the technical gap between the two countries. The findings offer actionable insights for developing countries seeking to address nontariff barriers and improve food and agricultural exports to developed markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Xiao & Genyuan Zhong & Xifang Ma, 2025. "Can Quality and Safety Demonstration Zone Policy Lower Nontariff Barriers? Evidence from Sino–US Food and Agricultural Trade," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(2), pages 65-97, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:65-97
    DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cwe.12579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:65-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwepacn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.