IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v44y1996i3p295-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Investment Risk in Tractors and Combines with Improved Terminal Asset Value Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • James Unterschultz
  • Glen Mumey

Abstract

Secondary asset market data for combines and tractors are used to estimate and separate out historical economic depreciation, embodied technological change and time value change. Combines and tractors generally exhibit constant geometric economic depreciation on a year to year basis. Depreciation rates vary by manufacturer. Farm investors can use these manufacturer specific depreciation rates reported here to estimate terminal asset values. The study found significant seasonal differences in machinery depreciation rates. A major source of error in forecasting terminal asset values comes from changes related to time. There is a predictable time component to the constant quality asset index that has not been investigated in previous studies. Unanticipated shocks to demand should be followed by price reversion to long-run average manufacturing costs as industry capacity adjusts to demand. This reversion component is predicable. Investment risk over longer planning horizons may be lower when both depreciation coefficients and time component estimates are employed.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • James Unterschultz & Glen Mumey, 1996. "Reducing Investment Risk in Tractors and Combines with Improved Terminal Asset Value Forecasts," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 44(3), pages 295-309, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:44:y:1996:i:3:p:295-309
    DOI: j.1744-7976.1996.tb00152.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1996.tb00152.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1744-7976.1996.tb00152.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivan Herranz-Matey & Luis Ruiz-Garcia, 2023. "A New Method and Model for the Estimation of Residual Value of Agricultural Tractors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Ivan Herranz-Matey & Luis Ruiz-Garcia, 2024. "Enhancing Predictive Accuracy in European Agricultural Tractor Residual Value Estimation: A Double Square Root Regression Reappraisal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Tozer, Peter R., 2005. "Depreciation Rates for Australian Tractors and Headers - Is Machinery Depreciation a Fixed or Variable Cost?," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137951, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Ivan Herranz-Matey & Luis Ruiz-Garcia, 2024. "New Agricultural Tractor Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) Model in Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ivan Herranz-Matey & Luis Ruiz-Garcia, 2023. "Agricultural Combine Remaining Value Forecasting Methodology and Model (and Derived Tool)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Troy J. Dumler & Robert O. Burton & Terry L. Kastens, 2003. "Predicting Farm Tractor Values through Alternative Depreciation Methods," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 506-522.
    7. Trautman, Dawn & Jeffrey, Scott R. & Unterschultz, James R., 2012. "Beneficial Management Practice (BMP) Adoption -- Direct Farm Cost/Benefit Tradeoffs," Project Report Series 139638, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    8. Dumler, Troy J. & Burton, Robert O., Jr. & Kastens, Terry L., 2000. "Use Of Alternative Depreciation Methods To Estimate Farm Tractor Values," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21800, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Luis Ruiz-Garcia & Patricia Sanchez-Guerrero, 2022. "A Decision Support Tool for Buying Farm Tractors, Based on Predictive Analytics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Ivan Herranz-Matey & Luis Ruiz-Garcia, 2023. "Agricultural Tractor Retail and Wholesale Residual Value Forecasting Model in Western Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Daninger, Nathan & Gunderson, Michael A., 2017. "The Pricing and Depreciation Patterns of Used Tractors," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258282, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:44:y:1996:i:3:p:295-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.