IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i2p2449-2468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Gap Between Legitimacy and Voluntary Disclosure Theory and Current Corporate Nonfinancial Reporting Practices: Insights From Japanese Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Kimitaka Nishitani
  • Jin Dong Park
  • Mohammad Badrul Haider

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to bridge the gap between conventional assumptions of legitimacy and voluntary disclosure theories and current practices of corporate nonfinancial reporting. The analysis conducts regressions using data on 244 Japanese companies in 2019 to clarify whether the triadic relationship between a company's nonfinancial reporting motivation and practices and user information satisfaction is consistent. It contributes to the literature by showing that conventional assumptions have limitations in explaining the triadic relationship and identifying the mechanism underpinning how corporate nonfinancial reporting functions. First, although companies are more motivated by financial accountability than legitimacy in nonfinancial reporting, these motivations are not directly opposing, but are instead relative. Second, even when the financial accountability and legitimacy motivations are clear, they do not consistently satisfy user information needs. Finally, companies fulfil the financial accountability role only after they fulfil the legitimacy role.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimitaka Nishitani & Jin Dong Park & Mohammad Badrul Haider, 2025. "Bridging the Gap Between Legitimacy and Voluntary Disclosure Theory and Current Corporate Nonfinancial Reporting Practices: Insights From Japanese Companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 2449-2468, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:2449-2468
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:2449-2468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.