IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i2p2207-2221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firms' Preferences for Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence From Small and Medium Enterprises in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Wai‐Fung Lam
  • Lin Nie
  • Edward KF Chan

Abstract

Though large corporations have made significant strides in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) integration, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face challenges due to limited resources and incentives. This study explores the preferences and priorities of SMEs in Hong Kong—a major financial hub with over 340,000 SMEs—regarding ESG policy instruments, addressing a critical gap in current scholarship that often overlooks the perspectives of regulatees. Utilizing a conjoint experiment, this research assesses SMEs' preferences for ESG policies with varying levels of specificity in ESG aspects. We find that SMEs generally favor some form of ESG regulation over none; preferences vary across policy fields and subsectors. The findings indicate that understanding SMEs' preferences is necessary to design effective policy tools that encourage ESG adoption. By focusing on regulatees' perceptions, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of ESG policy design, offering valuable insights for policymakers aiming to enhance corporate sustainability across diverse business sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wai‐Fung Lam & Lin Nie & Edward KF Chan, 2025. "Firms' Preferences for Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence From Small and Medium Enterprises in Hong Kong," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 2207-2221, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:2207-2221
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:2207-2221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.