IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p88-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Haozhe Song
  • Gunnar Rimmel

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of mandatory sustainability reporting on the affected firms' debt financing costs. Leveraging sustainability disclosure regulations enacted in 36 jurisdictions from 1998 to 2022 and using a staggered difference‐in‐differences empirical approach, we find that the regulation adoption firms experience a reduction in the debt financing cost subsequent to the mandate. Channel tests reveal that the benefit of a lower cost of debt is driven by greater transparency on sustainable practices and improved sustainability performance, which lead to a lower level of default risk stemming from sustainability‐related concerns. Cross‐sectional analyses further indicate that the debt financing cost reduction effect is more pronounced if the sustainability reporting regulations are issued by a government institution, on a full compliance basis, and with stronger enforcement. Our results provide policymakers with further evidence on the ongoing discussion about the effectiveness of sustainability disclosure mandates.

Suggested Citation

  • Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:88-115
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3959
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:88-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.