Author
Listed:
- Umit Bulut
- Nicholas Apergis
- Cem Isik
- Serdar Ongan
Abstract
Enhancing environmental quality is currently a key focus for policymakers. Furthermore, researchers are also prioritizing the investigation of novel variables that can influence environmental quality. The yield spread is commonly used as a leading indicator for business cycles in the macro‐finance literature, providing information about future expectations regarding business cycles. The yield spread also presents information about the borrowing costs of firms. None of the existing studies in the environmental economics literature has tested the impact of the yield spread on environmental quality, implying the level of the yield spread has not been considered a variable that can influence environmental quality. This study aims to fill this gap by providing evidence on the effect of yield spread (between 2‐ and 10‐year government bonds) on environmental quality in the United States from June 1976 to September 2023. The results indicate that an increase in the yield spread leads to a rise in environmental destruction. These results suggest two considerable consequences. First, optimistic expectations today lead to the overuse of resources and environmental destruction. Second, firms' higher borrowing costs may be forcing them to use less environmentally friendly production methods to offset more expensive financing costs and increase their profits. This study asserts that companies should enhance their environmental sensitivity, and policymakers should adopt a more proactive stance, based on the results of this study and other research that demonstrates the detrimental impacts of environmental regulation violations and poor environmental performances on companies' stock prices and financial performances.
Suggested Citation
Umit Bulut & Nicholas Apergis & Cem Isik & Serdar Ongan, 2025.
"A new look at the finance–environment nexus: How yield spread affects environmental quality in the United States,"
Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 749-761, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:749-761
DOI: 10.1002/bse.4016
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:749-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.