IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p555-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring drivers and factors of benefit impact reports quality: Retracing a stakeholder theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Esposito
  • Arcangelo Marrone
  • Vincenzo Pontrelli
  • Angela Rella

Abstract

In the pursuit of global sustainability, firms play an increasingly pivotal role. In this scenario, Benefit Corporations aim to seamlessly integrate profit‐making endeavors with sustainable practices. This corporate model has spread around the world and in Italy; it was adopted through Law No. 208/2015 introducing Italian Benefit Corporations (BCs). Italian BCs must produce a Benefit Impact Report (BIR) alongside their financial statements, as a strategic communication tool for demonstrating the company's commitment to advancing common societal benefits to stakeholders. Leveraging stakeholder theory, this study adopts a mixed methodological approach that incorporates manual content analysis of BIRs from 132 Italian BCs, combined with a regression model exploring the impact of firm characteristics on the quality of BIRs. Findings highlight a positive relationship between firm size, financial leverage, and profitability on the quality of BIRs. This study is the first to explore the quality of BIRs and their determinants, providing academic and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Esposito & Arcangelo Marrone & Vincenzo Pontrelli & Angela Rella, 2025. "Exploring drivers and factors of benefit impact reports quality: Retracing a stakeholder theory approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 555-569, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:555-569
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3974
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:555-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.