IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p39-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decontesting an essentially contested concept: The standardization of sustainable finance

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Boiral
  • Marie‐Christine Brotherton
  • David Gilbert‐Parisée
  • David Talbot
  • Isabelle Martinez

Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate how the standardization process and the public consultations carried out in the development of new sustainable finance standards and laws tend to shape the decontestation of practices in this field. The analysis of 255 comment letters submitted by various stakeholders in the context of these public consultations shows the dual role of standardization as a mechanism for both the decontestation and the (re)contestation of sustainable finance. This article makes important contributions to the emerging literature on the governance of sustainable finance through initiatives that are meant to improve the transparency of disclosures in this field and prevent investor misconduct. In light of Gallie's theory of essentially contested concepts, this article also contributes to the literature on the challenges of developing sustainability standards and the implications of adopting practices centered on concepts whose meanings and applications are the subject of endless disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & David Gilbert‐Parisée & David Talbot & Isabelle Martinez, 2025. "Decontesting an essentially contested concept: The standardization of sustainable finance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 39-56, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:39-56
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3972
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:39-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.