IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p1267-1286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do SMEs have an ESG communication strategy? Exploring the quality and influencing factors of voluntary ESG disclosures using web‐based and annual report channels

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Cardoni
  • Evgeniia Kiseleva

Abstract

This paper evaluates the influencing factors and disparities between web‐based and annual report channels for environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures by small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs). In contrast to the prevalent use of case‐studies in the context of SMEs, a quantitative study was conducted by performing a content analysis of the websites and annual reports of 100 manufacturing SMEs in Italy. Based on the collected evidence, SMEs exhibited a higher level of web‐based disclosures compared to annual reports. These disclosure channels appear to be independent of each other, with financial resources significantly influencing the quality of annual reports (i.e. profitability as a proxy) and size impacting information available on websites (i.e. turnover as a proxy). Both channels may be explained by the resource‐based view, while agency characteristics (such as having a Big Four external auditor or board size) have a relevant effect on the overall voluntary ESG disclosure score.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva, 2025. "Do SMEs have an ESG communication strategy? Exploring the quality and influencing factors of voluntary ESG disclosures using web‐based and annual report channels," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1267-1286, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:1267-1286
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:1267-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.