IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i8p8868-8881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Jin Deng Chan
  • Bon Cheung
  • Louis Yue Shen

Abstract

The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Jin Deng Chan & Bon Cheung & Louis Yue Shen, 2024. "An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8868-8881, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:8868-8881
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3951
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:8868-8881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.