IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i6p5703-5720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder pressure and circular supply chain practices: Moderating roles of environmental information exchange capability and circular innovation orientation

Author

Listed:
  • Yaw Agyabeng‐Mensah
  • Ebenezer Afum
  • Charles Baah

Abstract

This study deploys institutional theory and Resource orchestration theory (ROT) to examine the roles supply chain stakeholder pressure, circular innovation orientation (CIO) and environmental information exchange capability (EIEC) play in adopting Circular supply chain (CSC) practices. This study uses a partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS‐SEM) to analyse survey data gathered from 290 managers of manufacturing Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Ghana. This study finds that pressure from supply chain stakeholders substantially drives manufacturing SMEs' CSC practices. This study confirms that EIEC negatively moderates the relationship between supply chain stakeholder pressure and CSC practices. Finally, this study confirms the complementarity between CIO and EIEC through moderating effects between supply chain stakeholder pressure and CSC practices. This study advances circular supply chain management (CSCM) literature by testing a research framework that examines important but rarely studied roles of CIO and EIEC in SMEs' CSC practices adoption under supply chain stakeholder pressure through institutional and resource orchestration perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaw Agyabeng‐Mensah & Ebenezer Afum & Charles Baah, 2024. "Stakeholder pressure and circular supply chain practices: Moderating roles of environmental information exchange capability and circular innovation orientation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5703-5720, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5703-5720
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3779
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5703-5720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.