IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v76y2020i2p606-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of secondary phenotypes in multigroup association studies

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Zhou
  • Haibo Zhou
  • Tengfei Li
  • Hongtu Zhu

Abstract

Although case‐control association studies have been widely used, they are insufficient for many complex diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and breast cancer, since these diseases may have multiple subtypes with distinct morphologies and clinical implications. Many multigroup studies, such as the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), have been undertaken by recruiting subjects based on their multiclass primary disease status, while extensive secondary outcomes have been collected. The aim of this paper is to develop a general regression framework for the analysis of secondary phenotypes collected in multigroup association studies. Our regression framework is built on a conditional model for the secondary outcome given the multigroup status and covariates and its relationship with the population regression of interest of the secondary outcome given the covariates. Then, we develop generalized estimation equations to estimate the parameters of interest. We use both simulations and a large‐scale imaging genetic data analysis from the ADNI to evaluate the effect of the multigroup sampling scheme on standard genome‐wide association analyses based on linear regression methods, while comparing it with our statistical methods that appropriately adjust for the multigroup sampling scheme. Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Zhou & Haibo Zhou & Tengfei Li & Hongtu Zhu, 2020. "Analysis of secondary phenotypes in multigroup association studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 606-618, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:606-618
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13157
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiawei Wei & Raymond J. Carroll & Ursula U. Müller & Ingrid Van Keilegom & Nilanjan Chatterjee, 2013. "Robust estimation for homoscedastic regression in the secondary analysis of case–control data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(1), pages 185-206, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naomi C. Brownstein & Jianwen Cai & Shad Smith & Luda Diatchenko & Gary D. Slade & Eric Bair, 2022. "Modeling Secondary Phenotypes Conditional on Genotypes in Case–Control Studies," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yinghao Pan & Jianwen Cai & Sangmi Kim & Haibo Zhou, 2018. "Regression analysis for secondary response variable in a case‐cohort study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1014-1022, September.
    2. Naomi C. Brownstein & Jianwen Cai & Shad Smith & Luda Diatchenko & Gary D. Slade & Eric Bair, 2022. "Modeling Secondary Phenotypes Conditional on Genotypes in Case–Control Studies," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Kartsonaki, Christiana & Cox, D. R., 2023. "Regression Reconstruction from a Retrospective Sample," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 87-92.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:606-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.