IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i3p906-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence bands for multiplicative hazards models: Flexible resampling approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Dobler
  • Markus Pauly
  • ThomasH. Scheike

Abstract

We propose new resampling‐based approaches to construct asymptotically valid time‐simultaneous confidence bands for cumulative hazard functions in multistate Cox models. In particular, we exemplify the methodology in detail for the simple Cox model with time‐dependent covariates, where the data may be subject to independent right‐censoring or left‐truncation. We use simulations to investigate their finite sample behavior. Finally, the methods are utilized to analyze two empirical examples with survival and competing risks data.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Dobler & Markus Pauly & ThomasH. Scheike, 2019. "Confidence bands for multiplicative hazards models: Flexible resampling approaches," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 906-916, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:906-916
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13059
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Ditzhaus & Jon Genuneit & Arnold Janssen & Markus Pauly, 2023. "CASANOVA: Permutation inference in factorial survival designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 203-215, March.
    2. J. Feifel & D. Dobler, 2021. "Dynamic inference in general nested case‐control designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 175-185, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:906-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.