IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v72y2016i4p1285-1293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence sets for optimal factor levels of a response surface

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Wan
  • Wei Liu
  • Frank Bretz
  • Yang Han

Abstract

Construction of confidence sets for the optimal factor levels is an important topic in response surfaces methodology. In Wan et al. (2015), an exact (1−α) confidence set has been provided for a maximum or minimum point (i.e., an optimal factor level) of a univariate polynomial function in a given interval. In this article, the method has been extended to construct an exact (1−α) confidence set for the optimal factor levels of response surfaces. The construction method is readily applied to many parametric and semiparametric regression models involving a quadratic function. A conservative confidence set has been provided as an intermediate step in the construction of the exact confidence set. Two examples are given to illustrate the application of the confidence sets. The comparison between confidence sets indicates that our exact confidence set is better than the only other confidence set available in the statistical literature that guarantees the (1−α) confidence level.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Wan & Wei Liu & Frank Bretz & Yang Han, 2016. "Confidence sets for optimal factor levels of a response surface," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1285-1293, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:72:y:2016:i:4:p:1285-1293
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12500
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Del Castillo E. & Cahya S., 2001. "A Tool for Computing Confidence Regions on the Stationary Point of a Response Surface," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 55, pages 358-365, November.
    2. John J. Peterson & Suntara Cahya & Enrique Castillo, 2002. "A General Approach to Confidence Regions for Optimal Factor Levels of Response Surfaces," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 422-431, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianluca Trotta & Stefania Cacace & Quirico Semeraro, 2022. "Process optimization via confidence region: a case study from micro-injection molding," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2045-2057, October.
    2. Zhou, Sanyu & Wan, Fang & Liu, Wei & Bretz, Frank, 2017. "Computation of an exact confidence set for a maximum point of a univariate polynomial function in a given interval," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 157-161.
    3. Wei Liu & Frank Bretz & Natchalee Srimaneekarn & Jianan Peng & Anthony J. Hayter, 2019. "Confidence Sets for Statistical Classification," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianluca Trotta & Stefania Cacace & Quirico Semeraro, 2022. "Process optimization via confidence region: a case study from micro-injection molding," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2045-2057, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:72:y:2016:i:4:p:1285-1293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.