IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v66y2010i2p613-620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Covariate Adjustment and Ranking Methods to Identify Regions with High and Low Mortality Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Huilin Li
  • Barry I. Graubard
  • Mitchell H. Gail

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Huilin Li & Barry I. Graubard & Mitchell H. Gail, 2010. "Covariate Adjustment and Ranking Methods to Identify Regions with High and Low Mortality Rates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 613-620, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:66:y:2010:i:2:p:613-620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01284.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan M. Laird & Thomas A. Louis, 1989. "Empirical Bayes Ranking Methods," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 14(1), pages 29-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rubiana Chamarbagwala & Rusty Tchernis, 2006. "The Role of Social Norms in Child Labor and Schooling in India," CAEPR Working Papers 2006-016, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    2. Daniel Bonnéry & Yang Cheng & Neung Soo Ha & Partha Lahiri, 2015. "Triple-goal estimation of unemployment rates for U.S. states using the U.S. Current Population Survey data," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(4), pages 511-522, December.
    3. Mahlet G. Tadesse & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Robert Gentleman & Sabina Chiaretti & Jerome Ritz & Robin Foa, 2005. "Bayesian Error-in-Variable Survival Model for the Analysis of GeneChip Arrays," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 488-497, June.
    4. Nicholas T. Longford, 2004. "Missing data and small area estimation in the UK Labour Force Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 341-373, May.
    5. Nicholas C. Henderson & Michael A. Newton, 2016. "Making the cut: improved ranking and selection for large-scale inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 781-804, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:66:y:2010:i:2:p:613-620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.