IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v58y2002i4p964-971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranked Set Sampling: Cost and Optimal Set Size

Author

Listed:
  • Ramzi W. Nahhas
  • Douglas A. Wolfe
  • Haiying Chen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramzi W. Nahhas & Douglas A. Wolfe & Haiying Chen, 2002. "Ranked Set Sampling: Cost and Optimal Set Size," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 964-971, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:58:y:2002:i:4:p:964-971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00964.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vic Barnett & Karen Moore, 1997. "Best linear unbiased estimates in ranked-set sampling with particular reference to imperfect ordering," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 697-710.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. You-Gan Wang & Zehua Chen & Jianbin Liu, 2004. "General Ranked Set Sampling with Cost Considerations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 556-561, June.
    2. Kaushik Ghosh & Ram Tiwari, 2009. "A unified approach to variations of ranked set sampling with applications," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 471-485.
    3. Steven N. MacEachern & Elizabeth A. Stasny & Douglas A. Wolfe, 2004. "Judgement Post-Stratification with Imprecise Rankings," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 207-215, March.
    4. Haiying Chen & Elizabeth A. Stasny & Douglas A. Wolfe, 2006. "Unbalanced Ranked Set Sampling for Estimating a Population Proportion," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 150-158, March.
    5. Zehua Chen & You-Gan Wang, 2004. "Efficient Regression Analysis with Ranked-Set Sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 997-1004, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manoj Chacko, 2017. "Bayesian estimation based on ranked set sample from Morgenstern type bivariate exponential distribution when ranking is imperfect," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 333-349, April.
    2. Vic Barnett & Maria Cecilia Mendes Barreto, 2001. "Estimators for a Poisson parameter using ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 929-941.
    3. Raqab, Mohammad Z. & Kouider, Elies & Al-Shboul, Qasim M., 2002. "Best linear invariant estimators using ranked set sampling procedure: comparative study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-105, March.
    4. Gang Zheng & Mohammad Al-Saleh, 2003. "Improving the best linear unbiased estimator for the scale parameter of symmetric distributions by using the absolute value of ranked set samples," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 253-265.
    5. Wang, You-Gan & Zhu, Min, 2005. "Optimal sign tests for data from ranked set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 13-22, April.
    6. Manoj Chacko & P. Thomas, 2008. "Estimation of a parameter of Morgenstern type bivariate exponential distribution by ranked set sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(2), pages 301-318, June.
    7. Jesse Frey & Omer Ozturk, 2011. "Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(4), pages 769-789, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:58:y:2002:i:4:p:964-971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.