IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v57y2001i1p260-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood Ratio Tests for a Mixture of Two von Mises Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Scott D. Grimshaw
  • David G. Whiting
  • Thomas H. Morris

Abstract

Summary. It is proposed that the orientation of elongate objects, such as bones, may be used to identify the flow direction of ancient river deposits. If true, elongate objects could be of great value when ancient bedforms such as ripples and dunes are not visible. Two sandstone quarries were investigated wherein the paleoflow direction was determined from both bedforms and elongate dinosaur bones. A mixture of two von Mises distributions captures the observation that elongate bones transported under unidirectional flow conditions will align both parallel and perpendicular to the flow direction. Likelihood ratio tests for a mixture of two von Mises distributions are given. The power of these tests is investigated by simulation since the direction of dinosaur bones agrees with the primary bedforms if the hypothesis test comparing the dominant mean direction of the bones to the paleoflow direction fails to reject. The likelihood ratio test on the dominant mean direction has reasonable power. If the two mean directions in the mixture distribution are π apart, a more powerful likelihood ratio test can be used. The likelihood ratio test on the hypothesis that the two mean directions are exactly π apart is useful in determining if the assumptions of the more powerful test are satisfied.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott D. Grimshaw & David G. Whiting & Thomas H. Morris, 2001. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for a Mixture of Two von Mises Distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 260-265, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:260-265
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00260.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00260.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00260.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:260-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.