IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v34y2001i3p336-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply and Demand for Medical Care: Or, Is the Health Care Market Perverse?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Richardson

Abstract

The argument that health market behaviour is idiosyncratic is reviewed and evidence concerning ‘Supplier Induced Demand’ is presented. The theoretical basis and implications of this pivotal hypothesis are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Richardson, 2001. "Supply and Demand for Medical Care: Or, Is the Health Care Market Perverse?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 34(3), pages 336-352, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:34:y:2001:i:3:p:336-352
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.00203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8462.00203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ketelhöhn, Niels & Sanz, Luis, 2016. "Healthcare management priorities in Latin America: Framework and responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3835-3838.
    2. Tomasz Skica & Teresa Mroczek & Małgorzata Leśniowska-Gontarz, 2019. "The impact of selected factors on new business formation in the private healthcare sector," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 307-320, March.
    3. Shengelia, Bakhuti & Tandon, Ajay & Adams, Orvill B. & Murray, Christopher J.L., 2005. "Access, utilization, quality, and effective coverage: An integrated conceptual framework and measurement strategy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 97-109, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:34:y:2001:i:3:p:336-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.