IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v6y1996i11p29-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whither Financial Accounting Research: A Modern-Day Bo-Peep?

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Howieson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Howieson, 1996. "Whither Financial Accounting Research: A Modern-Day Bo-Peep?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(11), pages 29-36, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:6:y:1996:i:11:p:29-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1996.tb00005.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christie, Andrew A., 1990. "Aggregation of test statistics : An evaluation of the evidence on contracting and size hypotheses," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 15-36, January.
    2. Lowe, E. A. & Puxty, A. G. & Laughlin, R. C., 1983. "Simple theories for complex processes: Accounting policy and the market for myopia," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 19-42.
    3. Foster, George, 1980. "Accounting policy decisions and capital market research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 29-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Rutherford, 2010. "The social scientific turn in UK financial accounting research: A philosophical and sociological analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-171.
    2. Issam Benhayoun & Ibtissam Zejjari, 2022. "The diffusion of innovations’ theory shortfall in accounting standardization research: The case of IFRS for SMEs," Post-Print hal-03856952, HAL.
    3. Tyrone M. Carlin, 2018. "Accounting Research – The Road Not Taken," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 305-308, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence A. Boland & Irene M. Gordon, 1992. "Criticizing positive accounting theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 142-170, September.
    2. Watts, Ross L., 1992. "Accounting choice theory and market-based research in accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 235-267.
    3. Thomas W. Scott, 1991. "Pension disclosures under SFAS No. 87: Theory and evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 62-81, September.
    4. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2011. "Perks and the informativeness of stock prices in the Chinese market," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1410-1429.
    5. Oriol Amat & Oscar Elvira & Petya Platikanova, 2008. "Earnings management and audit adjustments: An empirical study of IBEX 35 constituents," Economics Working Papers 1129, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    7. Bei Luo & Terence Tai-Leung Chong, 2017. "Entrepreneurial activities and institutional environment in China," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 179-194, April.
    8. Prena Rani & Fazeena Fazneen Hussain & Priyashni Vandana Chand, 2013. "Managerial Incentives For Earnings Management Among Listed Firms: Evidence From Fiji," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 21-31.
    9. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Tang, Kar Mei, 2009. "Anonymity, liquidity and fragmentation," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 337-367, August.
    10. Eldenburg, Leslie & Pickering, Joanne & Yu, Wayne W., 2003. "International income-shifting regulations: Empirical evidence from Australia and Canada," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 285-303.
    11. Alex Frino & Riccardo Palumbo & Francesco Capalbo & Dionigi Gerace & Vito Mollica, 2013. "Information Disclosure and Stock Liquidity: Evidence from Borsa Italiana," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 423-440, December.
    12. González de la Fe, Pedro, 1998. "Las cuentas de las privatizaciones: el caso de Seat," DEE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía de la Empresa. DB 6398, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    13. Duffee, Gregory R., 1995. "Stock returns and volatility A firm-level analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 399-420, March.
    14. van Lent, L.A.G.M., 1999. "Incomplete contracting theory in empirical accounting research," Other publications TiSEM 088f797d-9fa4-4081-98f4-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Tan, Chyi Woan & Tower, Greg & Hancock, Phil & Taplin, Ross, 2002. "Empires of the sky: determinants of global airlines' accounting-policy choices," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 277-299.
    16. Bouwens, J.F.M.G. & van Lent, L.A.G.M., 2006. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Other publications TiSEM f83d0732-69e7-4b1c-87c2-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Pamela P. Peterson & Larry D. Wall, 1996. "Banks' responses to binding regulatory capital requirements," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 80(Mar), pages 1-17.
    18. Cooper, David J., 2014. "On the intellectual roots of critical accounting: A personal appreciation of Tony Lowe (1928–2014)," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 287-292.
    19. Reiter, Sara Ann & Williams, Paul F., 2002. "The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 575-607, August.
    20. Shyam Sunder, 1989. "Proof that in an efficient market, event studies can provide no systematic guidance for revision of accounting standards and disclosure policy for the purpose of maximizing shareholder wealth," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 452-460, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:6:y:1996:i:11:p:29-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.