IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v30y2020i4p243-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence‐informed Approach to Setting Standards: A Discussion on the Research Strategies of AASB and AUASB

Author

Listed:
  • Mukesh Garg
  • Kris Peach
  • Roger Simnett

Abstract

This paper provides a commentary on the approach used by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) in setting standards which are consistent with their vision and mission to contribute to stakeholder confidence in the Australian economy, including its capital markets, and in external reporting. The objective of the paper is to inform a wide range of stakeholders including academics, assurance practitioners, investors, preparers of financial reports and regulators on how the two standardsetters use a robust and transparent evidence‐informed approach to setting standards and guidance in Australia. The evidence is also applied to influence international standardsetters and to enhance key international relationships by demonstrating thought leadership. The AASB's and the AUASB's standard‐setting process involves robust consultation with stakeholders and is guided by the evidence‐informed standard‐setting frameworks of the two boards. The paper also provides insight into how evidence is gathered and implemented by the standardsetters and discusses the process for building and maintaining strong relationships with the research community. The collaborative effort not only supports researchers in contributing to the academic literature but also for them to have a regulatory impact by informing the financial reporting and assurance standard‐setting process. This paper investigates the application of the reporting entity concept by Australian charities through a broad scale empirical analysis of a random sample of 10% of large Australian charities. The paper finds that charity financial reporting is inconsistent and, in many cases does not meet the necessary reporting and audit requirements. The paper concludes that the application of the reporting entity concept, as embodied in SAC 1, does not provide for the quality of financial reporting it was designed to promote.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukesh Garg & Kris Peach & Roger Simnett, 2020. "Evidence‐informed Approach to Setting Standards: A Discussion on the Research Strategies of AASB and AUASB," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 243-248, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:243-248
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellie Norris & Shawgat Kutubi & Steven Greenland, 2022. "Accounting and First Nations: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 156-180, June.
    2. Michael E. Bradbury, 2020. "How the XRB Uses Research in Setting Accounting and Assurance Standards," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 249-256, December.
    3. Akhtar Ali & Imran Abbas Jadoon, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Yan Yu & Yi-Tsung Lee, 2022. "Do Inquiry Letters Curb Corporate Catering Motives of High Sustainable R&D Investment? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Chen, Jing & Liu, Xinghe & Ou, Fenghao & Lu, Meiting & Wang, Peipei, 2023. "Green lending and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the green credit reform in China," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. Flauzeliton José Aparecido Gonçalves & André Aroldo Freitas De Moura & Fabio Yoshio Suguri Motoki, 2022. "What influences the implementation of IFRS for SMEs? The Brazilian case," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2947-2992, June.
    7. Michael Bradbury & Bryan Howieson, 2020. "Editorial: Promoting the Usefulness of Research to Standard Setters," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 229-230, December.
    8. Inês Pinto & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Classification of Equity Instruments under IFRS 9: Determinants and Consequences," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 411-426, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:243-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.