IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v10y2000i20p56-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Basis for a Recoverable Amount Test

Author

Listed:
  • GEORGE HAMPTON
  • KAY PLUMMER

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • George Hampton & Kay Plummer, 2000. "A Conceptual Basis for a Recoverable Amount Test," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(20), pages 56-64, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:10:y:2000:i:20:p:56-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2000.tb00055.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Hampton, 1999. "The Role of Present Value-based Measurement in General Purpose Financial Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 22-32, March.
    2. Chambers, Rj, 1965. "Measurement In Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 32-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Pawsey & Lin Crase, 2013. "The Mystique of Water Pricing and Accounting," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 328-339, September.
    2. Russell Craig & Joel Amernic, 2002. "Accountability of accounting educators and the rhythm of the university: resistance strategies for postmodern blues," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 121-171.
    3. Tiago Cardao-Pito & João Silva Ferreira, 2018. "‘Fair Value’ accounting as the normative Fisherian phase of accounting," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 149-179, September.
    4. Barker, Richard & Schulte, Sebastian, 2017. "Representing the market perspective: Fair value measurement for non-financial assets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 55-67.
    5. George Hampton & Terry Bishop, 1998. "Measurement and the Australian Conceptual Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 8(15), pages 42-53, May.
    6. Geoffrey Whittington & Stephen Zeff, 2001. "Mathews, Gynther and Chambers: three pioneering Australian theorists," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 203-233.
    7. Joanne Horton & Richard Macve, 2000. "‘Fair Value’ for Financial Instruments: How Erasing Theory is Leading to Unworkable Global Accounting Standards for Performance Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(21), pages 26-39, July.
    8. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Joerg‐Markus Hitz & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2009. "Relevance of Academic Research and Researchers' Role in the IASB's Financial Reporting Standard Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 455-492, December.
    9. Tiago Cardao-Pito & João Silva Ferreira, 2018. "Demystifying fair value accounting: rejoinder to Baker and Markarian," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 199-202, September.
    10. Graeme Dean, 2010. "Background and Case for Exit Price Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(1), pages 84-96, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:10:y:2000:i:20:p:56-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.