IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v14y2000i2p14-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise of Anti‐dumping: Does Regionalism Promote Administered Protection?

Author

Listed:
  • William E. James

Abstract

Miranda, Torres and Ruiz (1998) and Finger (1993) have documented the increased incidence of anti‐dumping in recent years and its spread beyond developed to developing and transitional economies. The countries that have been the most prolific in launching anti‐dumping cases have largely been members of discriminatory trading arrangements such as NAFTA while the affected (accused) countries have often been outside regional trading blocs. This study documents and analyses the asymmetry in anti‐dumping actions, focusing on the propensity of members of regional trading blocs to use anti‐dumping actions against developing countries in East Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • William E. James, 2000. "The Rise of Anti‐dumping: Does Regionalism Promote Administered Protection?," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 14(2), pages 14-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:14:y:2000:i:2:p:14-26
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8411.00083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8411.00083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8411.00083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. James, William, 2008. "Have Antidumping Measures of EU and NAFTA Members against East Asian Countries Provoked Retaliatory Responses?," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 144, Asian Development Bank.
    2. William E. James, 2001. "Trade Relations of Korea and Japan: Moving for Conflict to Cooperation?," Economics Study Area Working Papers 11, East-West Center, Economics Study Area.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:14:y:2000:i:2:p:14-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.