IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v81y2010i4p583-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does The Mission Of Providers Matter On A Quasi‐Market? The Case Of The Belgian ‘Service Voucher’ Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Defourny
  • Arnaud Henry
  • Stéphane Nassaut
  • Marthe Nyssens

Abstract

ABSTRACT**: In 2001, the Belgian government introduced a ‘service voucher’ scheme in the field of domestic (housework) services, following a quasi‐market mechanism which fosters competition between providers of different types as regards sector (for‐profit, public, third sector) and mission (seeking profits, home care provision to vulnerable groups and work integration of the unemployed). Empirical evidence suggests that third sector organizations focusing on a social mission recognized by a tutelary regulation are the best performing with regards to the quality of jobs and service organization, leading to a better ‘triangulation’ of the service relationship. On the other hand, for‐profit providers, especially temporary work agencies, seem to favour their capacity of adaptation to the desiderata of their clients and costs’ minimization to the detriment of the quality of jobs which are made as flexible as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Defourny & Arnaud Henry & Stéphane Nassaut & Marthe Nyssens, 2010. "Does The Mission Of Providers Matter On A Quasi‐Market? The Case Of The Belgian ‘Service Voucher’ Scheme," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(4), pages 583-610, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:81:y:2010:i:4:p:583-610
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00423.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00423.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00423.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert McMaster, 2002. "The Analysis of Welfare State Reform: Why the “Quasi-Markets” Narrative Is Descriptively Inadequate and Misleading," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 769-794, September.
    2. Matthias Benz, 2005. "Not for the Profit, but for the Satisfaction? – Evidence on Worker Well‐Being in Non‐Profit Firms," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 155-176, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth Leduc & Ilan Tojerow, 2020. "Subsidizing Domestic Services as a Tool to Fight Unemployment: Effectiveness and Hidden Costs," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/340353, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility in a game-theoretic context," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 371-390, September.
    2. Laia Ollé-Espluga & Johanna Muckenhuber & Markus Hadler, 2021. "The ‘economy for the common good’, job quality and workers’ well-being in Austria and Germany," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 3-21, March.
    3. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    4. Fanti, Luciano & Buccella, Domenico, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and the choice of price versus quantities," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 71-78.
    5. Goering, Gregory E., 2008. "Welfare impacts of a non-profit firm in mixed commercial markets," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 326-334, December.
    6. Binder, Martin, 2016. "“…Do it with joy!” – Subjective well-being outcomes of working in non-profit organizations," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 64-84.
    7. Mathieu Narcy, 2011. "Would nonprofit workers accept to earn less? Evidence from France," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 313-326.
    8. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the firm revisited with environmental issues," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1421, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Tortia, Ermanno C., 2017. "The firm as a common. The case of the accumulation and use of capital resources in co-operative enterprises," MPRA Paper 76735, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Laurent Gardin & Marthe Nyssens & Paolo Minguzzi, 2010. "Les Quasi‐Marches Dans L’Aide A Domicile: Une Mise En Perspective Europeenne," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(4), pages 509-536, December.
    11. Goering, Gregory E., 2008. "Socially concerned firms and the provision of durable goods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 575-583, May.
    12. Pudney, Stephen & Conti, Gabriella, 2008. "If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands! Survey design and the analysis of satisfaction," ISER Working Paper Series 2008-39, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Martin Binder, 2015. "Do it with joy: Subjective well-being outcomes of working in non-profit organizations," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2015-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    14. Joanna Schmidt, 2016. "Nature of NGO Volunteers’ and Employees’ Motivation. Implications and Recommendations for Managerial Staff (Charakter motywacji wolontariuszy i pracownikow organizacji pozarz¹dowych. Implikacje i reko," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(61), pages 45-70.
    15. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Bonus Systems," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 4(2), pages 349-365, July.
    16. Simona Rasciute & Paul Downward, 2010. "Health or Happiness? What Is the Impact of Physical Activity on the Individual?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 256-270, May.
    17. Simon Cornée & Ariane Szafarz, 2018. "How Costly is Social Screening? Evidence from the Banking Industry," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 532-540.
    18. Claude Francoeur & Andrea Melis & Silvia Gaia & Simone Aresu, 2017. "Green or Greed? An Alternative Look at CEO Compensation and Corporate Environmental Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 439-453, February.
    19. Joseph LANFRANCHI & Mathieu NARCY, 2008. "Différence De Satisfaction Dans L'Emploi Entre Secteurs À But Lucratif Et À But Non Lucratif: Le Rôle Joué Par Les Caractéristiques D'Emploi," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(2), pages 323-368, June.
    20. Joseph Lanfranchi & Mathieu Narcy & Makram Larguem, 2010. "Shedding new light on intrinsic motivation to work: evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 75-93, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:81:y:2010:i:4:p:583-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.