IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v72y2001i1p45-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low Pay in the UK: The Case for a Three Sector Comparative Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Almond
  • Jeremy Kendall

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Almond & Jeremy Kendall, 2001. "Low Pay in the UK: The Case for a Three Sector Comparative Approach," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 45-76, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:72:y:2001:i:1:p:45-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-8292.00159
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumeetra Thozhur & Michael Riley & Edit Szivas, 2007. "Do the Poor Wake Up Quickly? A Study of Low Pay and Muted Horizons," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 139-150, March.
    2. Matosevic, Tihana & Knapp, Martin & Forder, Julien & Kendall, Jeremy, 2000. "Independent sector domiciliary care providers in 1999," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19012, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Fabienne Fecher & Benoît Lévesque, 2008. "The Public Sector And The Social Economy In The Annals (1975–2007): Towards A New Paradigm," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3‐4), pages 679-727, September.
    4. Jordan van Rijn & Shuwei Zeng & Brent Hueth, 2023. "Do credit unions have distinct objectives? Evidence from executive compensation structures," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 5-38, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:72:y:2001:i:1:p:45-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.