Author
Listed:
- Anthony Debons
- Klaus Otten
Abstract
Information science as a profession has its origin in the convergence of several information‐related sciences and technologies. These sciences and technologies were given impetus by developments during and following World War II. These made explicit the importance for the greater utilization of information technology to data processing and utilization for human decision functions. The need became evident for trained individuals to handle problems incident to greater information production and to develop systems to cope with such production. The program at the University of Dayton is an example of a graduate program to meet this need. The program postulates that there are training requirements at three levels, namely, Information Technologist at the undergraduate level, the Information System Specialist at the masters level, and the Information Scholar or Scientist at the doctoral level. Regardless of the level, the individual so trained should possess four capabilities; first, the ability to analyze problems systematically, second, the ability to communicate with individuals in other disciplines, third, to know the information technology and how to apply it, and fourth, to understand how the human element interacts with information processing and utilizing functions. To meet this requirement students are required to develop a program in four major areas, namely, in basic formalisms (mathematics, logic, scientific methodology, etc.), computed science, engineering (systems design, simulations, etc.) and behavioral science. Students are required to complete three graduate courses (nine hours) in each of the foregoing areas. Based on experience with the administration of such a program, several recommendations regarding courses and the role of students in the program are presented and discussed.
Suggested Citation
Anthony Debons & Klaus Otten, 1969.
"Foundations of a concept for an education program in information science,"
American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 346-351, October.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:4:p:346-351
DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200415
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:4:p:346-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.