IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v20y1969i3p268-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is interindexer consistency a hobgoblin?

Author

Listed:
  • William S. Cooper

Abstract

It is often assumed that the amount of interindexer consistency experienced under a given method of indexing is somehow indicative of the quality of the indexing. To explore this assumption, two hypotheses are stated concerning the possible connection between interindexer consistency and indexing quality. A specific counter‐example is then exhibited which shows both hypotheses to be invalid. Although a mathematical analysis of the counterexample yields certain insights, the general relationship between interindexer consistency and successful retrieval is more subtle than might have been expected. It is concluded that until equations describing this relationship have been derived, measurements of interindexer consistency will have little meaning as clues to indexing quality.

Suggested Citation

  • William S. Cooper, 1969. "Is interindexer consistency a hobgoblin?," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 268-278, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:3:p:268-278
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630200314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630200314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:3:p:268-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.