IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v19y1968i1p60-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offset printing from typescript as a substitute for microfilming of dissertations

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica L. Harris

Abstract

Most universities, since conventional printing of doctoral dissertations became prohibitively expensive, have switched to the University Microfilms plan, whereby typewritten copies are deposited with UM, microfilmed, and abstracts published in Dissertation Abstracts. However, in the last few years, newer printing methods, especially photo‐offset, have made short‐run publication an economic possibility for this purpose. Estimated costs of editions of 25 to 500 copies, produced by various methods, are presented here. The methods include microfilm and 5.5 × 8.5 in. Xerox Copyflo reproductions available from University Microfilms, short‐run photo‐offset at 31% and 50% reduction, single‐spaced short‐run photo‐offset at 50% reduction, full‐size Xeroxing on the new Xerox 2400, and photo‐offset from full‐size masters produced on the Xerox 914. It is shown that the cost of true publication of doctoral dissertations no longer need be prohibitive, even if the candidate were forced to pay all costs himself.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica L. Harris, 1968. "Offset printing from typescript as a substitute for microfilming of dissertations," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 60-65, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:19:y:1968:i:1:p:60-65
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090190111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090190111
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090190111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:19:y:1968:i:1:p:60-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.