IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v80y2021i3p887-901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Movies and the Complexity of U.S. Racial Inequity

Author

Listed:
  • David Giesen

Abstract

Three movies from more than half a century ago continue to offer valuable insights into the problem of white supremacy in the United States. Pinky (1949) tells the story of a light‐skinned Black woman who has a chance to escape the torments of racism by “passing,” but she chooses instead to build a more just system one day at a time. Since whites also have the option of “passing” by taking white privilege as a right, this story still has the capacity to sting the conscience. Intruder in the Dust (1949) reminds us of the importance of economic equality as the foundation of a just society. Until all are granted equal shares of the “common wealth,” social and political equality will remain a mirage. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? (1969) conveyed the terrible message at the end of the Civil Rights Movement that integration was a scheme that allowed only a few token Blacks to achieve the desired level of wealth necessary to socialize with whites. Whereas Martin Luther King, Jr. shifted his emphasis to economic equity in his final years, white Americans never fully grasped that civil rights depend on a distribution of wealth that would compensate for an unpaid debt to those who worked for centuries without reward. Instead, white America is still preparing a “dinner” that serves little more than symbols of equality.

Suggested Citation

  • David Giesen, 2021. "Movies and the Complexity of U.S. Racial Inequity," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(3), pages 887-901, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:80:y:2021:i:3:p:887-901
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:80:y:2021:i:3:p:887-901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.