IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v77y2018i5p1353-1376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Feminist Utopia: Radicalizing the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanne Cortiel

Abstract

Risk has taken over the world as the major way of conceptualizing the future as bleak, if one follows Ulrich Beck’s claim in World at Risk (2007). However, there is also a distinctly utopian strand in American risk discourse, one that has, from the outset, been linked to feminist perspectives. Indeed, when risk entered American culture in the 19th century, immediately women’s rights philosophy began to draw on futures shaped by risk, establishing self‐ownership and agency in a context that denied such freedom to women and non‐white men. This article explores connections between risk, futurity, agency, and selfhood as expressed in feminist thought, drawing a line between Margaret Fuller’s political essay Woman in the Nineteenth Century (1845), Joanna Russ’s science fiction novel The Female Man (1975), and Mary Daly’s radical feminist manifesto Quintessence: Realizing the Archaic Future (1998). The aim is not to develop a narrative of development but to see how risk has become useful in shaping distinctly feminist visions of the future. More specifically, I would like to see how risk‐taking has enabled feminist social dreaming. It is precisely this groundedness in risk that allows feminist utopian visions to remain productive in popular culture beyond feminist discourse. When, for example, the movie Alien (1979, dir. Ridley Scott) introduced a female protagonist to a science fiction/horror action plot, it drew on feminist utopian narrative patterns grounded in risk and risk‐taking. Feminist utopian visions as well as their continuations in popular culture thus bring out the subversive potential of risk for feminist theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanne Cortiel, 2018. "Risk and Feminist Utopia: Radicalizing the Future," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(5), pages 1353-1376, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:77:y:2018:i:5:p:1353-1376
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levy, Jonathan, 2012. "Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674047488, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy Johnson, 2015. "Reciprocity as a Foundation of Financial Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 43-67, September.
    2. Chatriot, Alain, 2014. "The laws of the markets: Historical perspectives on political-economic regulation. The example of twentieth-century french agricultural policy," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 15(3), pages 12-18.
    3. Gil Hersch, 2023. "Procedural Fairness in Exchange Matching Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 367-377, November.
    4. Lee Cronk & Athena Aktipis & Steven Gazzillo & Dave White & Amber Wutich & Barry Sopher, 2019. "Common knowledge promotes risk pooling in an experimental economic game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Timothy C. Johnson, 2013. "Reciprocity as the foundation of Financial Economics," Papers 1310.2798, arXiv.org.
    6. Jan K. Solarz, 2015. "Systemic Risk Management. Cognitive Perspective (Zarzadzanie ryzykiem systemu finansowego. Perspektywa poznawcza)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(55), pages 30-46.
    7. Peter Knight, 2013. "Introduction," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 2-12, February.
    8. John Wallis, 2015. "Rules, Organizations, and Governments," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(1), pages 69-86, March.
    9. González, Felipe & Marshall, Guillermo & Naidu, Suresh, 2017. "Start-up Nation? Slave Wealth and Entrepreneurship in Civil War Maryland," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(2), pages 373-405, June.
    10. Lee Cronk & Athena Aktipis, 2021. "Design principles for risk-pooling systems," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 825-833, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:77:y:2018:i:5:p:1353-1376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.