IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v66y2007i5p889-899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciling Weber and Mises on Understanding Human Action

Author

Listed:
  • Gene Callahan

Abstract

. Max Weber and Ludwig von Mises were two of the 20th century's foremost theorists of human action. Mises held Weber, his senior by some 17 years, in great esteem and often discussed his theories, even weaving some, such as Weber's model of ideal types, deeply into the fabric of his own social thought. However, at least at first glance, there seems to be a deep rift between the two men's conceptions about the rationality of action. Weber classified “social actions” into several distinct categories, some of which he saw as exhibiting little, if any, rationality. Mises, in contrast, held that all action is rational by conceptual necessity. Various writers have taken their views to be obviously incompatible, among them, Mises himself. This article suggests that the appearance of a conflict is produced by the failure to discern that Weber and Mises were addressing different sorts of questions and constructing frameworks to support different modes of analyzing social phenomena. I contend that, if that divergence of aim is properly understood, then the apparent contradiction will be seen as illusory.

Suggested Citation

  • Gene Callahan, 2007. "Reconciling Weber and Mises on Understanding Human Action," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(5), pages 889-899, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:66:y:2007:i:5:p:889-899
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00545.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00545.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00545.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. von Mises, Ludwig, 1976. "Epistemological Problems of Economics," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number mises1976.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Kolev, 2020. "The legacy of Max Weber and the early Austrians," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 33-54, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vihanto Martti, 1993. "Social Contract, Natural Law and Spontaneous Evolution: An Austrian Perspective," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 65-92, March.
    2. Mackintosh, Kenneth H., 1998. "Bargaining policies and social exchange: Review of a neglected concept," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 565-585.
    3. Steven Horwitz, 2011. "Theory, history, and the great recession," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 171-184, June.
    4. Di Iorio Francesco & Di Nuoscio Enzo, 2014. "Rethinking Boudon’s Cognitive Rationality in the Light of Mises’ Apriorism and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 129-142, December.
    5. Fusari, Angelo, 1994. "Paths of economic development: modelling factors of endogenous growth," MPRA Paper 75165, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 1994.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:66:y:2007:i:5:p:889-899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.