IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v64y2005i2p549-577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Anti‐Begging Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia K. Smith

Abstract

The Supreme Court has ruled that asking for money is a form of protected speech. However, it has also ruled that restrictions on the time, place, and manner of begging are constitutional. This paper examines 71 U.S. cities to determine what factors influence a city's propensity to enact anti‐begging regulations. The logistic regression results indicate that cities with higher welfare benefits are less likely to regulate begging. Cities with higher crime rates, higher proportions of disabled citizens, and higher proportions of college‐educated citizens, and cities that are more densely populated are more likely to regulate begging. While historians, ethnographers, and legal scholars have studied issues related to begging, economists generally have not. This paper uses the traditional economic model of rational choice to examine why some U.S. cities regulate begging and others do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia K. Smith, 2005. "The Economics of Anti‐Begging Regulations," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 549-577, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:64:y:2005:i:2:p:549-577
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2005.00379.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2005.00379.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2005.00379.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilmazkuday Hakan, 2017. "Anti-Crime Laws and Retail Prices," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Cristian Pérez Muñoz & Joshua D Potter, 2014. "Street-level charity: Beggars, donors, and welfare policies," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(1), pages 158-174, January.
    3. Stef Adriaenssens & Jef Hendrickx, 2011. "Street-level Informal Economic Activities: Estimating the Yield of Begging in Brussels," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(1), pages 23-40, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:64:y:2005:i:2:p:549-577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.