IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v48y1989i2p165-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Self‐concept of Black and White Women: The Influences Upon Its Formation of Welfare Dependency, Work Effort, Family Networks, and Illnesses

Author

Listed:
  • Lois Benjamin
  • James B. Stewart

Abstract

. The concept of “self‐efficacy” is used to test the hypothesis that the negative self‐concept of welfare recipients coniributes to long term psychological and material dependency on such assistance. Self‐efficacy focuses on the extent to which people are able to produce and regulate events in their lives and is associated with self‐imposed performance expectations. The extent to which the minority status which Blacks occupy in this society decreases self efficacy relative to Whites is examined, using information generated from structured interviews with 290 low income Black and White women. Operationalizing the concept of self‐efficacy with appropriate controls for socioeconomic status, family composition and other factors results in finding no racial differences in sense of self‐efficacy between Black and White women. Observed differences in patterns of receipt of public assistance are found to be more directly related to the persistence of structural barriers to upward mobility that have differential impacts on Blacks and Whites. Long term receipt of public assistance is found to adversely affect both self‐worth and work orientation/perceived efficacy for all women.

Suggested Citation

  • Lois Benjamin & James B. Stewart, 1989. "The Self‐concept of Black and White Women: The Influences Upon Its Formation of Welfare Dependency, Work Effort, Family Networks, and Illnesses," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 165-176, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:48:y:1989:i:2:p:165-176
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1989.tb02111.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1989.tb02111.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1989.tb02111.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth M. Harris & Kathryn Hopkins Kavanagh & Susan E. Hetherington & Doris E. Scott, 1992. "Strategies for AIDS Prevention," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 9-24, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:48:y:1989:i:2:p:165-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.