IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v16y1997i1p47-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative efficiency of women as farm managers: Profit function analysis in Côte d'Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Akinwumi A. Adesina
  • Kouakou K. Djato

Abstract

The efficiency of women farmers in the agricultural sector of developing countries is passionately debated. Very few studies have examined this issue in African agriculture. All previous studies were based on production functions, but have been criticised as suffering from simultaneous equation bias because the input levels are endogenous. The profit function method avoids these problems. No previous study has used the profit function method to lest for technical, allocative and economic efficiency differences between women and men farmers. The objective of this paper was to determine whether women rice farmers are less efficient than men rice farmers in Côte d'Ivoire using the restricted normalised profit function method. Our results show that the relative degree of efficiency of women is similar to that of men. The paper provides empirical support for efforts to eliminate bias against women farmers in African agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Akinwumi A. Adesina & Kouakou K. Djato, 1997. "Relative efficiency of women as farm managers: Profit function analysis in Côte d'Ivoire," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(1), pages 47-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:16:y:1997:i:1:p:47-53
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1997.tb00440.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1997.tb00440.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1997.tb00440.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burke, William J. & Jayne, T.S., 2021. "Disparate access to quality land and fertilizers explain Malawi’s gender yield gap," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Feyertag, Joseph & Childress, Malcolm & Langdown, Ian & Locke, Anna & Nizalov, Denys, 2021. "How does gender affect the perceived security of land and property rights? Evidence from 33 countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. J. B. Ayoola & T.M. Kudi & C. Dangbegnon & C.K. Daudu & A. Mando & I.Y. Amapu & J.O. Adeosun & K.S. Ezui, 2012. "Gender Perspectives of Action Research for Improved Rice Value Chain in Northern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(1), pages 211-211, January.
    4. Dsouza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok. K., 2016. "Adoption and Abandonment of Conservation Technologies in Developing Economies: The Case of South Asia," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235243, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Kouakou Kra Djato, 2001. "Crédit agricole et efficacité de la production agricole en Côte d'Ivoire," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 263(1), pages 92-104.
    6. Ross, Kara L. & Dalton, Timothy J. & Featherstone, Allen M., 2009. "A Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis of Bean Producers from North and South Kivu," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46575, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Ajibefun, Igbekele A., 2002. "Analysis of Policy Issues in Technical Efficiency of Small Scale Farmers Using the Stochastic Frontier Production Function: With Application to Nigerian Farmers," 13th Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002 7015, International Farm Management Association.
    8. Nguyen Hong & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2015. "Resource Use Efficiency of Tea Production in Vietnam: Using Translog SFA Model," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(9), pages 160-160, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:16:y:1997:i:1:p:47-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.