IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v10y1994i3p257-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International trade in a differentiated good: Trade elasticities in the world rice market

Author

Listed:
  • Mercedita C. Agcaoili‐Sombilla
  • Mark W. Rosegrant

Abstract

In many previous rice trade models, the commodity has been regarded as a homogeneous product. However, homogeneity is not an appropriate assumption, given the various types of rice that are traded and consumed. Parameters estimated from these models, therefore, do not reflect the real world market for rice and, hence, may mislead decision makers who use the results for policy evaluation purposes. This study uses an Armington approach to model the world rice trade as a differential good market and to derive trade elasticity parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercedita C. Agcaoili‐Sombilla & Mark W. Rosegrant, 1994. "International trade in a differentiated good: Trade elasticities in the world rice market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(3), pages 257-267, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:257-267
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00307.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00307.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00307.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wailes, Eric J. & Chavez, Eddie C., 2010. "Updated Arkansas Global Rice Model," Staff Papers 94347, University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    2. Wailes, Eric J. & Chavez, Eddie C., 2011. "2011 Updated Arkansas Global Rice Model," Staff Papers 102650, University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    3. Dharmasena, Senarath & Wang, Jing & Rosson, C. Parr III, 2013. "Price Non-Stationary and Import Demand for Milk in China," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 151151, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Hassanzoy, Najibullah & Ito, Shoichi & Isoda, Hiroshi, 2015. "Global To Domestic Price Transmission Between The Segmented Cereals Markets: A Study Of Afghan Rice Markets," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Ito, Shoichi & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Agcaoili-Sombilla, Mercedita C., 1995. "Quality-equivalent and cost adjusted measurement of international competitiveness in Japanese rice markets:," EPTD discussion papers 12, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Brennan, Donna, 2003. "Price dynamics in the Bangladesh rice market: implications for public intervention," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 15-25, July.
    7. Najibullah Hassanzoy & Shoichi Ito & Hiroshi Isoda & Yuichiro Amekawa, 2016. "A comparison of asymmetric price transmission from global to domestic markets between high and low quality grains: a case of Afghan rice markets," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 537-552.
    8. Jonathan I. Dingel & Kyle C. Meng & Solomon M. Hsiang, 2019. "Spatial Correlation, Trade, and Inequality: Evidence from the Global Climate," NBER Working Papers 25447, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. J. M. Gil & B. Dhehibi & M. Ben Kaabia & A. M. Angulo, 2004. "Non-stationarity and the import demand for virgin olive oil in the European Union," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(16), pages 1859-1869.
    10. Keeney, Roman & Beckman, Jayson, 2009. "WTO negotiations on agriculture and the distributional impacts for US rice farm households," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 70-80, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:257-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.