IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v53y2017i4p527-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Comparability of Company Accounts Conditionally: A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • Ross H. Taplin

Abstract

Comparability indices summarize the level of comparability between companies at a national and international level, an issue of importance to investors, regulators, and standard setters. Comparability indices can identify areas where comparability is low and where comparability is deteriorating. Furthermore, they can be used to quantify the extent to which initiatives such as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are successful in raising comparability between company accounts. Despite past literature emphasizing how factors other than country influence accounting methods used by companies, current comparability indices ignore these other factors. This paper introduces new national and international indices within the T index framework to fill this gap in the literature. Formula for the new national and international indices, and their standard errors, are provided. An example using European data is used to demonstrate the calculations and illustrate the importance of controlling for these firm specific factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross H. Taplin, 2017. "Measuring the Comparability of Company Accounts Conditionally: A Research Note," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(4), pages 527-542, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:53:y:2017:i:4:p:527-542
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12097
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Morris & R. Parker, 1998. "International harmony measures of accounting policy: comparative statistical properties," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 73-86.
    2. Sally Aisbitt, 2001. "Measurement of harmony of financial reporting within and between countries: the case of the Nordic countries," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 51-72.
    3. Ross Taplin, 2010. "Statistical inference using the T index to quantify the level of comparability between accounts," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 75-103.
    4. Barth, Mary E. & Clinch, Greg & Shibano, Toshi, 1999. "International accounting harmonization and global equity markets1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 201-235, January.
    5. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    6. Aziz Jaafar & Stuart McLeay, 2007. "Country Effects and Sector Effects on the Harmonization of Accounting Policy Choice," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 43(2), pages 156-189, June.
    7. Ross H. Taplin, 2011. "The Measurement of Comparability in Accounting Research," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 47(3), pages 383-409, September.
    8. Ross Taplin, 2004. "A unified approach to the measurement of international accounting harmony," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 57-73.
    9. Ray Ball, 1995. "Making Accounting More International: Why, How, And How Far Will It Go?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 8(3), pages 19-29, September.
    10. Asheq Rahman & Hector Perera & Siva Ganesh, 2002. "Accounting Practice Harmony, Accounting Regulation and Firm Characteristics," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(1), pages 46-77, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Gomaa & Kiridaran Kanagaretnam & Stuart Mestelman & Mohamed Shehata, 2019. "Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Replacing the Incurred Credit Loss Model of Bank Loan Loss Provisions with the International or US Accounting Standards Boards’ Expected Credit Loss Models," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019-10, McMaster University.
    2. Gomaa, Mohamed & Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran & Mestelman, Stuart & Shehata, Mohamed, 2021. "Test-bedding the new reporting standards for loan loss reserves," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 225-245.
    3. Gordon, Elizabeth A. & Gotti, Giorgio & Ho, Joanna H. & Mora, Araceli & Morris, Richard D., 2019. "Commentary: Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Stewart & Finley, Aimee, 2011. "Have IFRS made a difference to intra-country financial reporting diversity?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 22-38.
    2. Federica Doni & Ross Taplin & Roberto Verona, 2016. "Comparability of Company Accounts Using IFRS and US GAAP: Empirical Evidence of European and US Financial Statements," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-54, November.
    3. Cristina Silvia Nistor & Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu, 2012. "Public vs. Banking Sector Accounting - How Far Is Romania from International Referential?," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(3), pages 86-100, June.
    4. Stefanescu Cristina Alexandrina, 2012. "Accounting Practices From Financial Instruments Disclosure Perspective '" The Case Of Romanian Banking System," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 595-601, December.
    5. Qu, Xiaohui & Zhang, Guohua, 2010. "Measuring the convergence of national accounting standards with international financial reporting standards: The application of fuzzy clustering analysis," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 334-355, September.
    6. Riccardo Macchioni & Alessandra Allini & Martina Prisco, 2022. "The role of the Big Four audit firms and the legal system in non-GAAP comparability," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 79-116.
    7. Arthur Joseph Avwokeni, 2016. "Does IFRS Detract from Social Disclosure in Corporate Annual Report and Accounts? Evidence from Nigeria," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(5), pages 82-95, OCTOBER.
    8. Christopher S. Armstrong & Mary E. Barth & Alan D. Jagolinzer & Edward J. Riedl, 2008. "Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-032, Harvard Business School.
    9. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    10. Alessandro Mechelli, 2009. "Accounting Harmonization and Compliance in Applying IASB Standards: An Empirical Survey about the First Time Adoption of IAS 7 by Italian Listed Groups," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 231-270, December.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2091 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Armstrong, Christopher & Barth, Mary E. & Jagolinzer, Alan D. & Riedl, Edward J., 2006. "Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Adoption of IFRS in Europe," Research Papers 1937, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    13. Gordon, Elizabeth A. & Gotti, Giorgio & Ho, Joanna H. & Mora, Araceli & Morris, Richard D., 2019. "Commentary: Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Warwick Stent & Michael E. Bradbury & Jill Hooks, 2017. "Insights into accounting choice from the adoption timing of International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57, pages 255-276, April.
    15. Wafaa Salah & Abdallah Abdel-Salam, 2019. "The Effects of International Financial Reporting Standards on Financial Reporting Quality," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 5(3), pages 221-242, July.
    16. Salma Damak-Ayadi, 2007. "De L'Efficacite Des Mesures De Convergence Pour Preparer Le Passage Aux Ias/Ifrs En France," Post-Print halshs-00544879, HAL.
    17. Olante, Maria Elena & Lassini, Ugo, 2022. "Investment property: Fair value or cost model? Recent evidence from the application of IAS 40 in Europe," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    18. Elena Barbu, 2005. "Une Meilleure Connaissance De L'Environnement Comptable : Condition Sine Qua Non D'Une Meilleure Comprehension De L'Harmonisation Comptable Internationale," Post-Print halshs-00581120, HAL.
    19. Solomon Opare & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Tony van Zijl, 2021. "Meta‐analysis of the Impact of Adoption of IFRS on Financial Reporting Comparability, Market Liquidity, and Cost of Capital," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 502-556, September.
    20. De George, Emmanuel T. & Li, Xi & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2016. "A review of the IFRS adoption literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67599, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Jeroen Suijs, 2008. "On the Value Relevance of Asymmetric Financial Reporting Policies," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1297-1321, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:53:y:2017:i:4:p:527-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.