IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v39y2003i3p356-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement: A Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • R. G. Walker
  • Stewart Jones

Abstract

Australia has a long tradition of using methods of valuation which depart from the traditional ‘historical cost’ model—and this has steadily been reflected in regulatory requirements and practices for different industries. However, while many forms of market value accounting have been introduced into a variety of accounting standards, the Australian Accounting Standards Board's conceptual framework (CF) has not led these changes, nor provided any substantive guidance on measurement issues. This article suggests criteria that can be used to select among accounting measurement alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • R. G. Walker & Stewart Jones, 2003. "Measurement: A Way Forward," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 356-374, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:39:y:2003:i:3:p:356-374
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00138.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00138.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00138.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. J. Chambers, 1998. "Wanted: Foundations of Accounting Measurement," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 34(1), pages 36-47, March.
    2. Drake, Df & Dopuch, N, 1965. "On The Case For Dichotomizing Income," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 192-205.
    3. Robert P. Gray, 2003. "Research Note: Revisiting Fair Value Accounting––Measuring Commercial Banks’ Liabilities," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(2), pages 250-261, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graeme W. Dean & Frank L. Clarke, 2003. "An Evolving Conceptual Framework?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 279-297, October.
    2. Stewart Jones & Peter W. Wolnizer, 2003. "Harmonization and the Conceptual Framework: An International Perspective," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 375-387, October.
    3. Nicholas Pawsey & Lin Crase, 2013. "The Mystique of Water Pricing and Accounting," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 328-339, September.
    4. Brian Booth, 2003. "The Conceptual Framework as a Coherent System for the Development of Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 310-324, October.
    5. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    6. Janice A. Loftus, 2003. "The CF and Accounting Standards: The Persistence of Discrepancies," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 298-309, October.
    7. Stewart Jones & Sheikh F. Rahman & Peter W. Wolnizer, 2004. "Accounting Reform in Australia: Contrasting Cases of Agenda Building," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 40(3), pages 379-404, October.
    8. Graeme Dean, 2010. "Background and Case for Exit Price Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(1), pages 84-96, March.
    9. R. G. Walker & G. R. Oliver, 2005. "Accounting for expenditure on software development for internal use," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(1), pages 66-91, February.
    10. El-Tawy, Nevine & Tollington, Tony, 2013. "Some thoughts on the recognition of assets, notably in respect of intangible assets," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-80.
    11. Raar, Jean, 2008. "A basic user utility preference to reduce uncertainty: A dissent to reporting and asset measurement," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 785-804.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Lennard, 2010. "The Case for Entry Values: A Defence of Replacement Cost," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(1), pages 97-103, March.
    2. Graeme Dean, 2010. "Background and Case for Exit Price Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(1), pages 84-96, March.
    3. Mary E. Barth, 2015. "Financial Accounting Research, Practice, and Financial Accountability," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(4), pages 499-510, December.
    4. Stewart Jones & Alison D. Higgins, 2006. "Australia's switch to international financial reporting standards: a perspective from account preparers," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(4), pages 629-652, December.
    5. stanley c. w. salvary, 2005. "Financial Accounting Measurement: Instrumentation And Calibration," Finance 0502001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Malcolm Anderson, 1999. "Accounting History Publications 1998," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 375-384.
    7. Robert P. Gray & Frank L. Clarke, 2004. "A Methodology for Calculating the Allowance for Loan Losses in Commercial Banks," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 40(3), pages 321-341, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:39:y:2003:i:3:p:356-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.