IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v38y2002i2p263-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to the Evaluation of Audit Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Michael E. Bradbury
  • Paul Rouse

Abstract

This article demonstrates how data envelopment analysis can be used to weight audit risk factors. Data from a previously reported study applying the analytic hierarchy process is used to facilitate a comparison between these two methods. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has several advantages, including the ability to accommodate a range of expert opinions on the importance of a specific risk factor, rather than using the median or mean value. DEA can be used to provide high‐risk and low‐risk assessments and provides benchmark audit units from which other units can be evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael E. Bradbury & Paul Rouse, 2002. "An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to the Evaluation of Audit Risk," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(2), pages 263-279, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:38:y:2002:i:2:p:263-279
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6281.00108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6281.00108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahoo, Biresh K. & Acharya, Debashis, 2010. "An alternative approach to monetary aggregation in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 672-682, August.
    2. Gholam R. Amin & Osama El‐Temtamy & Samy Garas, 2022. "Audit Risk Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Ordinal Data," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(3), pages 589-602, September.
    3. Michael E. Bradbury & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Large audit firm premium and audit specialisation in the public sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(3), pages 657-679, September.
    4. Cheng-Ru Wu & Che-Wei Chang & Hung-Lung Lin, 2008. "FAHP Sensitivity Analysis for Measurement Nonprofit Organizational Performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 283-302, June.
    5. Nurhan Davutyan & Lerzan Kavut, 2005. "An application of data envelopment analysis to the evaluation of audit risk: a reinterpretation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(3), pages 290-306, October.
    6. Mónica Domínguez-Serrano & Francisco Blancas, 2011. "A Gender Wellbeing Composite Indicator: The Best-Worst Global Evaluation Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 477-496, July.
    7. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Shang, Jennifer & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan, 2009. "A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 219-231, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:38:y:2002:i:2:p:263-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.