IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Meaning of Alternative Sentences

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Leka
  • Ardita Bylo

Abstract

Draft legislation imposes criminal democratic request for the inclusion of legal instruments that help more in punitive role of the sentence given by the court, by adapting a number of factors and circumstances that cannot accept the classical severity of punishment. This will maximize the peaceful character of the law but also would affect levels significantly above sentence enhancers’ purpose. In other words, the criminal law has more need for legal flexibility, giving a considerable assistance and judicial bodies. This flexibility is achieved by using not only clearly defined penalties and stiffly but also creating an amalgam arising from the acquisition of qualitative elements of some types of penalties are available always maintaining sustainable character of the criminal sentence. This flexibility between types of sentences leads us first what is called alternative sentence. Must have a clear alternative that should not understand this notion of broad term for a criminal offense then you can choose punishment of imprisonment or fine, because this determines the choice of law without much skating, but we are dealing with a process which allows us to within a clearly defined type of punishment may be able to detach some other elements of criminal justice thus building a sustainable form of criminal punishment completely featured. Methods of her execution contain essentially what we call the social reintegration of morality offender. Resuming the alternative mentioned above for sentencing will give this definition: the alternative sentence of imprisonment shall mean those sentences given by courts for crimes when the law set distinct criteria which lie within the framework of prison sentences but due to certain circumstances, psychological, moral, family, ways of executing them rigorously regulated by means of isolation are common. Alternative sentencing is not excluded from the punishment. Based on these alternative sentencing court determines the extent of the general rules defined in the law. While suffering with conditional sentencing court a number of factors present as well as how you will behave in the future the prisoner. There are significant differences in terms of the way that making that final decision and the execution in respect of other fixed penalties. Regarding the mode of decision making unlike other court fines wider access in the provision of these convictions. For, although the law sets rigid criteria for these cases again the role of the court is crucial in analyzing and defining the specific circumstances that makes a decision necessary with such character. These circumstances can be very varied, character health, family, professional, moral, where the court must decide each case that when the elements of the relative usefulness for granting an alternative to imprisonment. While related to the form of execution of the sentence here we have a main difference with respect to the manner of execution of the sentence because although alternatives to imprisonment for a legal background has sentence to imprisonment, execution of sentence classical form far from this being done so original executed away from traditional insulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Leka & Ardita Bylo, 2014. "The Meaning of Alternative Sentences," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 3, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:672
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n2p11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/2942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/2942/2902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n2p11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.