IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness of Dismissal as a Sanction for Misconduct in South African Labour Law

Author

Listed:
  • CM van der Bank

Abstract

In determining whether a dismissal based on misconduct is fair, all the facts surrounding the misconduct must be considered. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) commissioner had to determine whether or not a misconduct dismissal was fair. CCMA unfair dismissals arbitration proceedings constituted hearings de novo which meant that the CCMA commissioner had to make his finding, as to the fairness of the dismissal, not on the basis only of evidence led at the internal disciplinary hearing, but on the basis of all evidence led at the CCMA arbitration proceedings, including evidence led that had not been led at the internal disciplinary hearing. The Constitutional Court had to decide whether a commissioner at CCMA arbitration was performing an administrative function. The Court concluded that the commissioner arbitration was an administrative action but that Promotion of Administrative Justice Act No.3 of 2000 is not applicable to CCMA arbitration awards. The fairness of dismissing an appellant from employment must be tested against the review standard laid down by the constitutional court in Sidumo.

Suggested Citation

  • CM van der Bank, 2014. "Fairness of Dismissal as a Sanction for Misconduct in South African Labour Law," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 3, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:630
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n1p139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/2072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/2072/2059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n1p139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.