IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/1604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Comparison of the Major Stock Exchanges: NYSE, NASDAQ and LSE in Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Isida Mansaku
  • Saimir Mansaku
  • Ioannis Tampakoudis

Abstract

As (Considering that) listing on any exchange provides a great opportunity to the corporates or entrepreneurs for raising capital in order to fund new projects or to undertake expansions or diversifications, we have conducted an empirical research on the largest stock exchanges worldwide, focusing more on New York Stock Exchange, London Stock Exchange and NASDAQ respectively. The main purpose of this study is to provide evidence on the performance of the three exchanges with the emphasis on some key indicators for the period spanning from 2010 to 2014. The analysis conducted on these indicators reflects the progress of the exchanges during this period and provides a great statistical significance. Moreover, the recent trends are tracked down to demonstrate how this valuable source can be channeled into decision making. The findings outline that the stock exchanges are reliable barometers to measure the economic growth of a country and could be beneficial for a range of market participants, such as companies or current and potential investors when selecting a stock exchange, for issuers, and of course for scholars to get a better idea about the important happenings on stock exchanges and to understand the impact that one exchange movement has on other.

Suggested Citation

  • Isida Mansaku & Saimir Mansaku & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2016. "An Empirical Comparison of the Major Stock Exchanges: NYSE, NASDAQ and LSE in Perspective," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 5, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1604
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/9814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/9814/9452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.