IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/1573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics and Cognitive Biases: Can the Group Decision-Making Avoid Them?

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Osmani

Abstract

Bad decisions can be the result of occasional or cognitive errors. Occasional errors are related to information content and its validity, or may refer to errors in understanding the problem or situation. Cognitive distortions are systematic errors, repeated constantly and unconsciously. These too may be the result of errors in information interpretation or related to its reliability and accuracy. Heuristics and cognitive biases affect the different stages of the decision-making process and have negative effects on human behavior and relationships, because they are not easily identifiable and preventable. However, the use of heuristics and cognitive biases makes easier the decision-making process. The current study tries to understand and formulate some final conclusions regarding the presence of the cognitive distortions in the decision-making process, comparing the individual level to the group level. The main reason for choosing this topic is the increased use of groups to make decisions due to the dynamic, uncertain and turbulent environment, the horizontal structure, the difficulty to establish universal rules which guide the decision-making and the higher complexity. So, the aim of the current paper is to understand if the group can be a valid tool to avoid or reduce the use of heuristics and cognitive biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Osmani, 2016. "Heuristics and Cognitive Biases: Can the Group Decision-Making Avoid Them?," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 5, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1573
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/9784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/9784/9422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.