IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/1226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Analysis on the Summary Judgment Based on the Penal Procedural Code of the Republic of Albania

Author

Listed:
  • Luan Hasneziri

Abstract

After the fall of the communist system, the new Penal Procedural Code of the Republic of Albania was approved by the Law no. 7905, dated on 21.03.1995 and entered into force on august 1st, 1995. This Code compared to the other Penal Procedural Codes of communism period, is different, as it is contemporary and democratic, aiming to determine procedural regulations on criminal acts judgment, as well as providing defense and warranty of the defendants’ rights and freedom along penal process. This Penal Procedural Code provides a new element, the summary judgment, which was not provided before by previous Codes of communism regime. Taking into account that judges, lawyers, prosecutors and other officials of the judiciary, were not familiar with this element, since the very beginning it was a real issue in the context of its accuracy and its right. The goal of this paper is to handle, and summarize the summary judgment in accordance with the Penal Procedural Code provisions of the Republic of Albania. The first case will provide legal procedures that regulate the aggregated decision, provisions provided by Penal Procedural Code. In this case legal provisions will be given, not only merely based on findings, but also on the context of viewpoint, in a critical aspect and issues related to the judiciary practice. The second case we will have to review issues came across in the judiciary practice in Albania related to aggregated decision. Herein after, we will have to review the Unified decision of the High Court no. 2 dated on 29.01.203, as well as some other decisions of the Constitutional court, where their main topic of review is particularly the aggregated decision. Main hypothesis to present in this paper is: Does the Penal Procedural code fully and fairly regulate the aggregated decision? The answer related to this question is No. The code does not fully effectively regulate this procedural element. At the end of this paper, I will provide the achieved conclusions and also the biography where it is based upon.

Suggested Citation

  • Luan Hasneziri, 2015. "A Critical Analysis on the Summary Judgment Based on the Penal Procedural Code of the Republic of Albania," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 4, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1226
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n2s2p89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/7410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/7410/7094
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n2s2p89?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.