Author
Abstract
The relationship between international law and domestic law is object of different theories among which the most relevant are: the Monist Theory, Monist Inverse Theory, Dualist Theory, and Harmonization Theory. Indeed, these theories and all the other theories, aim nothing more or less than the explanation of the interdependent and hierarchical relationship between the international law and domestic law. Indeed, the study and the analysis of relationship between the rules of international law and rules of domestic law has a particular importance, because the determination of solutions and dilemmas in regards to this multiple and multidimensional relationship inter alia defines the statues of the state in the arena of the international relation, and impacts directly to its status as an equal member of international community. In fact, the ensemble of rules which we define today as International Law cannot be understood separated from the states domestic law. In reality, these two categories of legal rules are essentially interrelated in a hierarchical manner. Borders and content of the states domestic law systems, today very often are defined in almost natural manner by the rules of the International Law, which gradually have ensured a sustainable prevalence upon the rules of Domestic Law. Regardless of differences from a state to another, even in the case of the Republic of Kosovo, in essence the relationship between International Law and Domestic Law, consists inter alia in four main issues such as: 1. The relationship between rules of International Customary Law and the Domestic Law; 2. The relationship between the rules of International Treaties and the Domestic Law; 3. The relationship between the rules adopted by international organization in which Kosovo would be a member and the rules of Domestic Law; and 4. The relationship between the rules of International law and the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo itself. This paper aims exactly the analysis of these four issues from a comparative perspective with other states such as: the Republic of Albania, Germany, Netherlands, Italy and the United States of America.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.