IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v9y2024i11p138-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Assessment Framework for Competency-Based Education amongst Intellectual Disability Students in Technical and Vocational and Training (TVET) Institutions in Nairobi County

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Barongo

    (Department of Computing, Faculty of Information Communication Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya)

  • Dr. Kennedy Ogada

    (Department of Computing, Faculty of Information Communication Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya)

  • Dr. Dennis Njagi

    (Department of Computing, Faculty of Information Communication Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya)

Abstract

The shift to Kenya’s Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) in Nairobi County’s Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions underscored critical issues related to the exclusion and challenges faced by special needs students with intellectual disability(ID). Despite 13.5% of Kenyan children having these disabilities, only 6% are enrolled in schools, revealing a stark gap in educational accessibility. Existing assessment frameworks in TVET institutions lack inclusivity, perpetuating educational disparities and negatively impacting societal well-being. This study focused on proposing an inclusive Electronic Assessment Framework for Competency-Based Education (CBE) to address these deficiencies and ensure equitable access for students with disabilities. The study’s objective was to review the electronic assessment framework for competency-based education. The study was anchored in the TPACK theoretical framework guiding its process. The research employed a descriptive design, collecting quantitative and qualitative data from 177 respondents, including students with disabilities, caregivers, parents, tutors, institutional heads, and examining body representatives. The study identified several weaknesses in electronic assessment frameworks, with the most significant being a lack of comprehensive accessibility (35.3%). Other notable issues included non-adaptive designs (23.5%), insufficient training for educators (17.6%), and unspecified limitations (23.5%). To address these challenges, respondents suggested adopting universal design principles (30%) to improve accessibility, expanding educator training (24%) to enhance effective use, developing adaptive tools (17%) for diverse learner needs, and implementing stronger data privacy measures (29%) to protect student information. Regression analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between familiarity with these frameworks and their utilization (β = 0.32, p

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Barongo & Dr. Kennedy Ogada & Dr. Dennis Njagi, 2024. "Electronic Assessment Framework for Competency-Based Education amongst Intellectual Disability Students in Technical and Vocational and Training (TVET) Institutions in Nairobi County," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 9(11), pages 138-154, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:9:y:2024:i:11:p:138-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/digital-library/volume-9-issue-11/138-154.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/electronic-assessment-framework-for-competency-based-education-amongst-intellectual-disability-students-in-technical-and-vocational-and-training-tvet-institutions-in-nairobi-county/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:9:y:2024:i:11:p:138-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.