IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v6y2021i6p41-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Effect of Fresh and Dry Lemon Grass (Cymbopogon citratus) Granules on Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Author

Listed:
  • Uchendu Umeda

    (Department of Chemical / Petrochemical Engineering, Rivers State University, Portharcourt, Nigeria)

  • Emmanuel O. Ehirim

    (Department of Chemical / Petrochemical Engineering, Rivers State University, Portharcourt, Nigeria)

  • Ollor, A. Ollor

    (Department of Medical Laboratory Science,Rivers State University, Portharcourt, Nigeria)

  • Peter M. Ene

    (Department of Chemical / Petrochemical Engineering, Rivers State University, Portharcourt, Nigeria)

  • Harmony A. Chimezie-Nwosu

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Rivers State University, Portharcourt, Nigeria)

Abstract

This work compared the result of the effect of lemongrass granules as a local raw material in the treatment of crude oil polluted soils when it is in a fresh or dry condition. The comparison of the usage in fresh or dry state is aimed at identifying the most effective among the two conditions that will give the best result in biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. The soil samples were obtained with hand soil auger and analyzed in the laboratory using standard methods. Soil sample C represented the soil treated with fresh lemongrass while soil sample E was treated with dry lemongrass. Poultry droppings were added to them as nutrients while the experiment was monitored for 28days. The determined parameters were total petroleum hydrocarbon, pH, total nitrogen and phosphorous and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria. The results show that the soils samples were Clay soils and total petroleum hydrocarbon decreased by 77% and 24 % for soil sample C and E respectively. The soil pH values were 6.51 and 6.10 for soil sample C and E. Also total nitrogen was 0.11% and 0.355% for soil sample C and E. The concentration of phosphorous in soil sample C and E were 0.24 and 1.26% respectively. The hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria count increased from 3.65×103 cfu/g to 5.41×103 cfu/g in soil sample C but decreased to 2.10×103 cfu/g in soil sample E. Comparison of the two process showed a significant decrease in concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbon using fresh lemongrass granules to dry lemongrass granules. This implies that the use of fresh lemon grass is more effective compared to that of dry lemon grass granules. This is because the use of fresh lemongrass granules enhanced rapid growth of microorganism, therefore a significant result on biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon was achieved. This confirmed the use of fresh lemongrass granules as a better method compared to dry lemon grass granules in the treatment of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons.

Suggested Citation

  • Uchendu Umeda & Emmanuel O. Ehirim & Ollor, A. Ollor & Peter M. Ene & Harmony A. Chimezie-Nwosu, 2021. "Comparison of the Effect of Fresh and Dry Lemon Grass (Cymbopogon citratus) Granules on Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 6(6), pages 41-44, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:6:p:41-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/digital-library/volume-6-issue-6/41-44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/comparison-of-the-effect-of-fresh-and-dry-lemon-grass-cymbopogon-citratus-granules-on-biodegradation-of-petroleum-hydrocarbons/?utm_source=Netcore&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=sscollections25oct&utm_campaign=First&_gl=1*it1ijx*_gcl_au*Nzg3MDc3MjYxLjE3MDIwMTAzMzE.*_ga*MTA1MTkzODcwMi4xNjk0MTkxNTI0*_ga_J3C1TKKSZ0*MTcwODU3ODI1NC4yNjEuMS4xNzA4NTgwNzc5LjYwLjAuMA..&_ga=2.115234311.1050379947.1708314550-1051938702.1694191524
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:6:p:41-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.